Prove that a document existed, unchanged, on a given date
The first service of the network. You submit a hash; the network records a proof; you receive a certificate that anyone can verify — without trusting us, and without your document ever leaving your systems.
Six steps, one verifiable artefact
Hash the content locally
Your system computes the SHA-256 digest of the file or of the canonicalised dataset. The content itself never leaves your infrastructure.
Submit the hash
The digest is sent to LKS Notary over the REST API with an idempotency key, so a network retry never produces a duplicate proof.
The proof is written to the chain
The service builds a transaction carrying the proof and submits it to the network.
Finality is established
The block is confirmed and, once ChainLocks are active, signed by a masternode quorum — making the record irreversible within seconds rather than after a long confirmation wait.
The aggregated root is anchored to Bitcoin
All proofs in a time window are aggregated into a Merkle tree whose root is committed to Bitcoin through OpenTimestamps.
You receive a certificate
Certificate ID, transaction reference, timestamp, QR code and the .ots attestation file — everything a third party needs to verify independently.
No protocol change required
Notarisation is written as an unspendable output carrying arbitrary data, already supported by the codebase. No hard fork, no activation window to coordinate, no mandatory upgrade for wallets, exchanges or operators — which is precisely why it can ship on the available budget.
A proof nobody has to take on trust
Verifiability is the product. If a certificate can only be checked on our servers, it is a database record with extra steps.
Public verification page
Every certificate resolves to a page — reachable by QR code — showing the recorded proof, the transaction reference, the timestamp and the anchoring status. Only what the issuer chose to publish is shown.
Independent verifier
An open tool that lets any third party validate a certificate — Merkle path, chain reference and Bitcoin attestation — without depending on our servers. This is the element that makes the whole architecture credible.
Survives the network
Because the Merkle root is committed to Bitcoin, certificates already issued stay verifiable even in the worst-case scenario where the LKS network itself were to degrade in the future.
What organisations actually notarise
Contracts & agreements
Prove the version that was in force on a given date, and detect later alteration.
Technical documentation
Manuals, drawings, specifications and revisions with a verifiable version history.
Quality & compliance records
Test reports, inspection minutes and certificates that a customer or auditor can check independently.
Media & photography
Establish which content was associated with an identity at a point in time — including C2PA manifests.
Source code & releases
Anchor build artefacts and release hashes for supply-chain integrity.
Datasets & reports
Canonicalised structured data, so a reordering of JSON keys never breaks verification.
AI-generated material
Record what a system produced or modified, when, and under whose responsibility.
Editorial & scientific content
Publication proofs and a verifiable genealogy of subsequent revisions.
Proof of authenticity and content genealogy
Notarisation naturally evolves into a proof-of-provenance protocol. The system does not claim that a piece of content is “true” in any absolute sense — it demonstrates which content was associated with a given identity at a given date, and whether it was modified afterwards.
Every significant change produces a new proof linked to the previous one, turning the ledger into a registry of verifiable versions: contracts, technical manuals, certifications, software, scientific documentation and editorial content.
Version chain
document v1 → hash A
document v2 → hash B (parent: A)
document v3 → hash C (parent: B)
▼
verifiable history
A proof record carries the issuing identity, the timestamp, the content hash, the version, any attestations and the link to its parent.
Complementary to C2PA, not a competitor
For media and AI-generated material the market standard is C2PA (Content Credentials). Rather than defining a rival proprietary format, LKSCOIN positions itself as the anchoring registry for C2PA assertions: the manifest stays in the standard format, its proof of existence and non-alteration is anchored on the network.
What the proof is, stated precisely
The legal weight of DLT-based notarisation should be declared with precision rather than avoided. It is what separates a professional offering from an unverifiable promise.
The Italian framework
Article 8-ter(3) of Italian Decree-Law 135/2018 (converted by Law 12/2019) provides that storing an electronic document by means of distributed ledger technologies produces the legal effects of the electronic time stamp under Article 41 of Regulation (EU) 910/2014 (eIDAS). Paragraph 4 of the same article, however, delegates to AgID the identification of the technical standards such platforms must meet — and those standards have not been adopted to date.
The operational consequence is that storage on a DLT cannot today be treated as equivalent to a qualified electronic time stamp. Its real value is that of computer-based evidence, freely assessed by a court — significant, but without the legal presumption that Article 41 eIDAS reserves to qualified timestamping.
The recommended hybrid architecture
For clients that require legal certainty of date, the correct configuration combines both components. It is the only setup that holds up in front of a corporate legal department, and it turns a potential competitor — qualified trust service providers — into a component of the architecture.
| Component | What it provides | Supplied by |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified time stamp (RFC 3161) | Legal presumption of certain date and integrity | Qualified TSP |
| LKSCOIN + Bitcoin anchoring | Autonomous public verifiability, supplier independence, long-term non-repudiation | LKS network |
Notarisation is not an electronic signature. They are distinct legal instruments and are presented as such. A notarisation proves that a given content existed in a given state at a given time; it does not attribute a signatory's legal intent to that content.
No personal data on-chain. A public ledger is incompatible with the right to erasure. The network records cryptographic proofs, never content. Attestations can be logically revoked without deleting the historical proof.
eIDAS 2.0 and the EUDI Wallet are the reference frame for the evolution of the identity layer. Service responsibilities, limits and service levels towards enterprise clients are defined contractually.
Interested in an early pilot?
We are looking for organisations with a real, already-felt problem: lot recalls, quality disputes, or documentation requests from their own customers.